High Court of Kerala
Case Law Search
KOYA, S/O. MARAKKAR HAJI v. P.V. KUNHJU, S/O. VARKEY - WP(C) No. 6755 of 2007(D)  RD-KL 12486 (9 July 2007)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMWP(C) No. 6755 of 2007(D)
1. KOYA, S/O. MARAKKAR HAJI,
1. P.V. KUNHJU, S/O. VARKEY,
For Petitioner :SRI.G.SUKUMARA MENON
For Respondent :SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE
The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN
O R D E R
M.N.KRISHNAN, J.WP(C)No. 6755 OF 2007 D
Dated this the 9th July, 2007.
This writ petition is filed against the order of the Munsiff, Kalpetta in rejecting the prayer of the defendant to receive an additional written statement. The suit is based on Ext.A1 agreement and on the reverse of Ext.A1 which is marked as Ext.A1(a), the total supply is Rs.3,31,764/- out of which Rs.2,50,000/- is paid and the balance is Rs.81,764/-. It is alleged to be signed by the defendant and witnessed by two witnesses. Now the attempt of the defendant is to deny the entry in Ext.A1(a). This agreement was produced along with the plaint at the time of filing of the suit itself and even in the written statement in para 3 the defendant has taken care to deny the entries starting from 8.12.2003 to 6.11.2004. So, it is crystal clear that he was aware of these things even at the time of filing of the written statement. Thereafter, P.W.1 has been examined and cross-examined at length. Thereafter the present application is filed for making an amendment to the written statement. By allowing additional written statement to be filed at this stage it will take away a valuable right and further under Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of the written statement which is now filed and WPC 6755/07 2 styled as an additional written statement cannot be entertained after the commencement of the trial unless there are warranting circumstances to do so. This appears to be only an after thought when the defendant is confronted to face a difficult situation because of the endorsement behind Ext.A1 document, which is marked as Ext.A1(a). Therefore I find that the court below was perfectly justified in rejecting the application and therefore the writ petition is dismissed. M.N.KRISHNAN Judge jj
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.