Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

HARIKUMAR versus JIGESH SON OF CHANDRAN

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


HARIKUMAR v. JIGESH SON OF CHANDRAN - CRL A No. 1071 of 2001(C) [2007] RD-KL 12967 (13 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

CRL A No. 1071 of 2001(C)

1. HARIKUMAR
... Petitioner

Vs

1. JIGESH SON OF CHANDRAN
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.RAJIT

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.R.UDAYABHANU

Dated :13/07/2007

O R D E R

K.R.UDAYABHANU,J


================
CRL.A.No.1071 of 2001
=================

Dated this the 13th day of July,2007

ORDER

The appellant is the complainant who had initiated proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act which stand dismissed as the complainant was not present.

2. It is submitted that the lapse was on account of the wrong noting of the posting date. In the circumstances, the order of the court below is set aside. The court below is directed to permit the appellant to further proceed with the matter and dispose of the case on merits. The court below shall issue fresh summons to the accused. The appellant shall appear before the court below on 14.08.2007. The appeal is allowed.

K.R.UDAYABHANU,JUDGE

dvs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.