Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHAJI PHILIP, PANDIYAPPILLIL versus PALLIKKATHODU GRAMA PANCHAYATH

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SHAJI PHILIP, PANDIYAPPILLIL v. PALLIKKATHODU GRAMA PANCHAYATH - WP(C) No. 17729 of 2007(I) [2007] RD-KL 13051 (13 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 17729 of 2007(I)

1. SHAJI PHILIP, PANDIYAPPILLIL,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. PALLIKKATHODU GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
... Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY, PALLIKKATHODU GRAMA

3. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY,

For Petitioner :SRI.P.N.PURUSHOTHAMA KAIMAL

For Respondent :SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

Dated :13/07/2007

O R D E R

K.M.JOSEPH, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C).No.17729 OF 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 13th day of July, 2007



JUDGMENT

Case of the petitioner in brief is as follows: Petitioner has started a pig farm unit in the year 2003 in the respondent Panchayat by availing loan. No licence was required for piggery unit at that time. But due to the undue influence of some antisocial elements of that locality, Panchayat issued a notice to close down the unit even though petitioner has observed all conditions prescribed by Medical Officer and District Medical Officer. Petitioner filed appeal against the order of demolition of the unit. But that appeal was rejected by the Committee. Against that order petitioner preferred revision before the Panchayat Tribunal. Panchayat Tribunal allowed the revision and set aside the order passed by the Panchayat. Thereafter, respondent Panchayat passed a resolution imposing licence for piggery farm under Dog and Pig Licence Rule and Dangerous & Offensive Trades and Factory Rule. According to WPC No.17729/07 2 the petitioner, notice was not published properly. Petitioner applied for licence under Dog and Pig Licence Rule. But it was rejected by the respondent. Petitioner's application for licence under Dangerous and Offensive Trades and Factory Rule was also not considered. The intention of the Panchayat is to reject that application and issue notice to demolish the pig farm. Learned counsel for the Panchayat points out that petitioner has preferred an appeal against Ext.P10 and that will be considered on merit as it is filed in time. In such circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the appeal preferred by the petitioner after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and take a decision in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

(K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)

sv. WPC No.17729/07 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.