Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

K.P.MOHANASUNDARAM versus THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


K.P.MOHANASUNDARAM v. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION - WP(C) No. 15561 of 2007(C) [2007] RD-KL 13122 (16 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 15561 of 2007(C)

1. K.P.MOHANASUNDARAM,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
... Respondent

2. THE HEAD MASTER,

3. THE HEAD MASTER,

4. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,

For Petitioner :SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN

For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

Dated :16/07/2007

O R D E R

A.K.BASHEER, J.

W.P.(C)No.15561 OF 2007

Dated this the 16th day of July, 2007



JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a High School Assistant working now in the Government Higher Secondary School, Kundamkuzhy on deployment. It is the case of the petitioner that he has been deployed in the above school as High School Assistant (English) though he is entitled to get posting in the Government High School, Thayannur as HSA (Social Studies). He seeks to quash Exts.P5 and P8 orders passed by respondent no.1.

2. Anyhow, I do not propose to deal with the contentions raised by the petitioner at this stage, since the statutory appeal preferred by him is pending consideration before respondent no.4. The said fact is seen admitted in the counter affidavit filed by respondent no.4 as well. Learned Government Pleader submits that a decision on Ext.P9 appeal will be taken without any further delay. W.P.(C)No.15561 OF 2007

3. In the above facts and circumstances, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.4 to consider and pass orders on Ext.P9 strictly on its merit and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to mention that the petitioner shall be afforded sufficient opportunity to be heard before any decision is taken in the matter. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with a certified copy of the judgment before respondent no.4 for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above.

A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE

jes


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.