High Court of Kerala
Case Law Search
SHEELA JOHN v. SRI. MOHANDAS - Con Case(C) No. 994 of 2007(S)  RD-KL 13184 (16 July 2007)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMCon Case(C) No. 994 of 2007(S)
1. SHEELA JOHN,
1. SRI. MOHANDAS,
For Petitioner :SRI.DEEPU THANKAN
For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER
The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER
O R D E R
A.K.BASHEER, J.C.C.(C)No.994 OF 2007
Dated this the 16th day of July, 2007
It is brought to my notice that respondent has complied with the direction contained in the judgment. He has passed an order on July 7, 2007. Of course, there is delay in complying with the direction for which the respondent has offered unconditional apology.
2. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by the respondent is per se illegal. He further contends that the respondent had not properly considered the directions contained in the judgment in W.P.(C)No.18882/2005 while passing the order. May be so. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent she has to necessarily take recourse, to the remedy available to her under law. In this jurisdiction, I do not propose to deal with the merit or demerit of the order. Contempt of Court Case is closed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue her remedy under law, if she is aggrieved by order passed by the respondent.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.