Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

C.RAVINDRAN, S/O.CHAMIYAR, AGED 43 versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


C.RAVINDRAN, S/O.CHAMIYAR, AGED 43 v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 4034 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 13233 (17 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4034 of 2007()

1. C.RAVINDRAN, S/O.CHAMIYAR, AGED 43
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :17/07/2007

O R D E R

R. BASANT, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
B.A.No. 4034 of 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 16th day of July, 2007

O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. The crux of the contentions raised by the defacto complainant in the F.I. statement lodged by him is that he had deposited an amount of Rs.25,000/- in the finance company run by the petitioner as a Proprietory concern. Inspite of the promise made, amount has not been returned. Crime has been registered. Investigation is in progress. The petitioner apprehends imminent arrest.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is absolutely innocent. It is submitted that he is only a partner of the company. The other partners were running the business. Allegations are raised against the petitioner, who has nothing to do with the actual business. It is only to vex and harass the petitioner the allegations are raised. In these circumstances directions under Section 438 Cr.P.C. may be issued in his favour, submits the counsel. B.A.No. 4034 of 2007 2

3. The learned Prosecutor opposes the application. But notwithstanding the opposition, I am satisfied that appropriate directions under Section 438 Cr.P.C. can be issued in favour of the petitioner now.

4. In the result: (1) This application is allowed. (2) The following directions are issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

(a) The petitioner shall surrender before the learned Magistrate on 24.7.2007 at 11 a.m. The learned Magistrate shall release the petitioner on regular bail on his depositing an amount of Rs.10,000/- as cash security and executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate.

(b) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation before the Investigating Officer between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. on 25.7.07 and 26.7.2007 and thereafter on all Mondays and Fridays between 10 a.m. and 12 noon for a period of one month and subsequently as and when directed by the Investigating Officer in writing to do so.

(c) If the petitioner does not appear before the learned Magistrate as directed in clause (1) above, these directions shall lapse on 24.7.07 and the B.A.No. 4034 of 2007 3 police shall be at liberty thereafter to arrest the petitioner and deal with him in accordance with law.

(d) If the petitioner were arrested prior to his surrender on 24.7.2007 as directed in clause (1) above, he shall be released from custody on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- without any surety undertaking to appear before the learned Magistrate on 24.7.2007. (R. BASANT) Judge tm


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.