Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

CHINNAMMA K.D. versus THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


CHINNAMMA K.D. v. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS - WP(C) No. 22112 of 2007(G) [2007] RD-KL 13332 (18 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 22112 of 2007(G)

1. CHINNAMMA K.D.,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,
... Respondent

2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

4. THE CORPORATE MANAGER,

For Petitioner :SRI.K.JAJU BABU

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

Dated :18/07/2007

O R D E R

A.K.BASHEER, J.

W.P.(C)No.22112 OF 2007

Dated this the 18th day of July, 2007



JUDGMENT

Petitioner is now stated to be working as Lower Grade Hindi Pandit (Part-time) in the school under the management of respondent no.4. It is the contention of the petitioner that her earlier appointments for two short spells were approved as could be seen from Exts.P1 and P2. But the proposal for approval of her appointment with effect from July 15, 2002 as per Ext.P5 was rejected. It is on record that the Director of Public Instruction who had considered the matter on an earlier occasion, had remitted back the issue to respondent no.2 for fresh consideration. But still, the Controlling Officer passed Ext.P7 order declining the request for approval.

2. Learned counsel submits that the Manager has preferred Ext.P9 revision petition before respondent no.1 against Ext.P7 order passed by the controlling officer. Limited prayer is to issue an appropriate direction to respondent no.1 to take a decision on Ext.P9 and while doing so, to give the petitioner also W.P.(C)No.22112 OF 2007 an opportunity to be heard. There is a further prayer to issue a direction to respondent no.1 keep in view Ext.P8 order issued by Government while taking the decision in the matter.

3. In the above facts and circumstances, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.1 to consider and pass orders on Ext.P9 strictly on its merit and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner and the manager shall be afforded sufficient opportunity to be heard before any decision is taken in the matter. While taking decision, respondent no.1 shall keep in view Ext.P8 order of the Government. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with a certified copy of the judgment before respondent no.1 for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above.

A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE

jes


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.