Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

HARIHARAN, S/O.POOVATHUNKADAVIL versus VYAPARAVIJAYAM HIRE PURCHASE PVT. LTD.

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


HARIHARAN, S/O.POOVATHUNKADAVIL v. VYAPARAVIJAYAM HIRE PURCHASE PVT. LTD. - CRP No. 607 of 2005 [2007] RD-KL 13345 (18 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

CRP No. 607 of 2005()

1. HARIHARAN, S/O.POOVATHUNKADAVIL
... Petitioner

Vs

1. VYAPARAVIJAYAM HIRE PURCHASE PVT. LTD.,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.K.G.BALASUBRAMANIAN

For Respondent :SRI.N.SUKUMARAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

Dated :18/07/2007

O R D E R

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.

.......................................................... C.R.P.No.607 OF 2005 ...........................................................

DATED THIS THE 18th JULY, 2007

O R D E R

The 3rd judgment-debtor, admittedly a military pensioner is aggrieved by the order of the execution court finding that in spite of means he has wilfully neglected to pay the decree debt and directing issuance of warrant for arresting him on that basis.

2. Heard Sri.K.G.Balasubramanian, counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Bobby Mathew, counsel for the respondent.

3. Mr.Balasubramanian submitted that the petitioner has complied with the condition imposed by this Court on 8.6.2005 that a sum of Rs.15,000/- shall be paid by the petitioner to the decree-holder within three weeks from that date. He further submitted that adequate opportunity was not granted by the execution court for producing the pension book. He sought for an opportunity to produce the pension book.

4. Having regard to the circumstances attending on this case, I feel that opportunity can be afforded to the petitioner for producing the pension book, but only on conditions. Accordingly, I set aside the impugned order and direct the execution court to afford opportunity to the petitioner to produce the pension book and convince the court C.R.P.N0.607/05 that the petitioner does not have the capacity to pay even a substantial portion of the decree-debt. Since the matter is going back to the court below, both sides are permitted to adduce whatever evidence they have at their command on the issue. However, the order of remand will be subject to the condition that the petitioner shall pay every month commencing from 16.8.2007 at the rate of Rs.1500/- till such time as the enquiry is completed. The enquiry shall be completed and orders passed by the learned Subordinate Judge at the earliest and at any rate within three months of the petitioner producing copy of this order.

(PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE)

tgl C.R.P.N0.607/05 C.R.P.N0.607/05


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.