Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

NAFEESA, AGED 44 YEARS, D/O.MOIDUNNI versus ABDUL SALAM, THARAYIL AKAYIL

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


NAFEESA, AGED 44 YEARS, D/O.MOIDUNNI v. ABDUL SALAM, THARAYIL AKAYIL - CRP No. 1465 of 2004 [2007] RD-KL 13402 (18 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

CRP No. 1465 of 2004()

1. NAFEESA, AGED 44 YEARS, D/O.MOIDUNNI,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. ABDUL SALAM, THARAYIL AKAYIL,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.K.ABDUL JAWAD

For Respondent :SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN

Dated :18/07/2007

O R D E R

P.R.RAMAN,J


================
C.R.P.No.1465 of 2004
=================

Dated this the 18th day of July,2007

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order passed in I.A.371/2004 in O.S.94/2002 of the Munsiff Magistrate Court, Mannarkkad. The petitioner was the plaintiff in the suit for dissolution of marriage under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act. The suit was dismissed on 31.1.2004. Thereafter, present application was filed contending that the court has not considered all the grounds urged in the plaint and according to the petitioner the judgment is to be reviewed. The court find that even if it is assumed that the decision rendered is erroneous Order 47 Rule 1 do not permits rehearing of it. When the point urged is not considered, certainly it may be open to the parties to bring to the notice of the court about the non consideration of the point, omitted to be considered. I am not going to the merits of the contention since the petitioner has already preferred an appeal against the decree and judgment passed by C.R.P.No.1465/2004 the court below it is open to urge such contention available under law including whether there is omission in considering any point by the trial court. Subject to the above observation, Civil Revision Petition is dismissed.

P.R.RAMAN,JUDGE

dvs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.