Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DR. V.K.SIVASANKARAN, S/O. KRISHNAN versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


DR. V.K.SIVASANKARAN, S/O. KRISHNAN v. STATE OF KERALA - Crl MC No. 2334 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 13617 (20 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 2334 of 2007()

1. DR. V.K.SIVASANKARAN, S/O. KRISHNAN,
... Petitioner

2. RITA SIVASANKARAN,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.P.V.CHANDRA MOHAN

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :20/07/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J.

Crl.M.C.No.2334 of 2007

Dated this the 20th day of July 2007

O R D E R

The petitioners face allegations under Section 498A I.P.C. Cognizance has already taken. The petitioners have appeared before the learned Magistrate and have been enlarged on bail. On one day of posting that is 4/6/2007, they were ill and did not appear before the learned Magistrate. The learned Magistrate has issued a non-bailable warrant of arrest against the petitioners. The said warrant is now chasing the petitioners. The petitioners submit that they are absolutely innocent. They are willing to surrender before the learned Magistrate and seek bail but they apprehend that their application for bail may not be considered by the learned Magistrate on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. They, therefore, pray that directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. may be issued to the learned Magistrate to release the petitioners on bail when they appear and apply for bail.

2. It is for the petitioners to appear before the learned Magistrate and explain to the learned Magistrate, the Crl.M.C.No.2334/07 2 circumstances under which they could not earlier appear before the learned Magistrate.

3. I find absolutely no reason to assume that the learned Magistrate would not consider the application for bail to be filed by the petitioners on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. Every court must do the same. No special or specific directions appear to be necessary. Sufficient general directions have been issued in Alice George vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police [2003(1)KLT 339]. In the result, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is dismissed but with the specific observation that if the petitioners surrender before the learned Magistrate and apply for bail, after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself. The warrant of arrest issued against the petitioners shall not be executed till 24/7/2007 i.e the next date of posting. Hand over copy of this order to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge Crl.M.C.No.2334/07 3 Crl.M.C.No.2334/07 4

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.