Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

GOURI AMMA MEENAKSHIAMMA versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


GOURI AMMA MEENAKSHIAMMA v. STATE OF KERALA - OP No. 6898 of 1995(U) [2007] RD-KL 13628 (20 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

OP No. 6898 of 1995(U)

1. GOURI AMMA MEENAKSHIAMMA
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN

For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

Dated :20/07/2007

O R D E R

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,J


=======================
O.P.Nos.6898 of 1995 and 7302 of 1997
=========================

Dated this the 20th day of July, 2007



JUDGMENT

This writ petitions relate to the service of Teacher in an Aided School. It appears that there was a civil dispute as to the title to the Educational Agency. The petitioner is one among the rival claimants to the management. It is stated that as if now there is a Scheme that governs this School.

2. The petitioner who had a claim to be the manager of the school challenges the appointment of the teacher and the approval granted by the statutory authorities to such appointment. That is the subject matter of O.P.6898/1995.

3. During the pendency of aforesaid case, the teacher in question obtained orders from the Government for release of salary due to her. This action of the Government is challenged in O.P.7302/1997 by the petitioner in O.P.6898/1995. O.P.Nos.6898/1995 & 7302/1997

4. Whatever be the right of a person having an interest in the management to challenge such decision, I am not inclined to entertain any such contention at this distance of time, particularly when it is the admitted situation that the teacher in question, on the basis of her approved appointment, had discharged duties and responsibilities for the last more than a decade. It would be unreasonable and unjust to upset it. For the aforesaid reason, these writ petitions are dismissed.

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE

dvs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.