Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MOHAMMED SHEREEF, ALIKKAL HOUSE versus THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


MOHAMMED SHEREEF, ALIKKAL HOUSE v. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY - WP(C) No. 22460 of 2007(W) [2007] RD-KL 13804 (23 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 22460 of 2007(W)

1. MOHAMMED SHEREEF, ALIKKAL HOUSE,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY,
... Respondent

2. THE REVENUE SECRETARY,

For Petitioner :SRI.I.DINESH MENON

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

Dated :23/07/2007

O R D E R

S.SIRI JAGAN,J


================
W.P.(C).No.22460 of 2007
======================

Dated this the 23rd day of July 2007



JUDGMENT

The petitioner challenges Exts.P1 and P2 revenue recovery notices by which the petitioner has been directed to pay arrears of Motor Vehicle Tax due from the petitioner. Petitioner submits that before issue of Exts.P1 and P2 petitioner was not favoured with a demand notice and therefore, Exts.P1 and P2 are unsustainable. However the petitioner submits that the petitioner would pay the amount if given some time. The learned Government Pleader opposes the prayer. Having heard both sides, I dispose of the writ petitioner with the following directions: Petitioner shall pay an amount of Rs.40,000/- within two weeks from today. Balance shall be paid in ten equal monthly instalments starting from 16.8.2007. The subsequent instalments shall be paid on the first working day after 15th of every succeeding month. If the petitioner pays the amounts as directed above, further proceedings pursuant to Exts. P1 and P2 shall be kept in abeyance. However, if the petitioner defaults W.P.(C).22460/2007 2 payment of either the Rs.40,000/- or any of the subsequent instalments, it would be open to the respondents to continue the proceedings in accordance with Exts.P1 and P2 without having to issue any fresh notice or proceedings in that regard.

S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

dvs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.