Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DEVAKI, AGED 41 YEARS, W/O.LATE AITHAPPA versus STATE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


DEVAKI, AGED 41 YEARS, W/O.LATE AITHAPPA v. STATE - REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR - Bail Appl No. 4450 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 13884 (24 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4450 of 2007()

1. DEVAKI, AGED 41 YEARS, W/O.LATE AITHAPPA
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE - REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
... Respondent

2. THE RANGE OFFICER,

For Petitioner :SRI.M.SASINDRAN

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :24/07/2007

O R D E R

R. BASANT, J.

B.A. NO. 4450 OF 2007

Dated this the 24th day of July, 2007

ORDER

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner - a woman, faces allegations under the Kerala Abkari Act. She is alleged to have kept in her possession 50 x 100 ml. of Karnataka arrack in Palakkad. Since the detecting party did not consist of any female official, the petitioner could not be arrested. Investigation is complete. Final report has already been filed. Committal proceedings has been registered. The petitioner has not appeared before the learned Magistrate. Consequently, she finds coercive processes issued by the learned Magistrate chasing her.

2. According to the petitioner, she is absolutely innocent. Her absence earlier was not wilful. The petitioner is willing to co-operate with the court for the early disposal of the case. B.A. NO. 4450 OF 2007 -: 2 :- She is willing to surrender before the learned Magistrate. The petitioner apprehends that her application for regular bail may not be considered by the learned Magistrate on merits in accordance with law and expeditiously. It is, in these circumstances, that the petitioner has come to this Court for a direction to the learned Magistrate to release her on bail when she appears before the learned Magistrate.

2. It is for the petitioner to appear before the learned Magistrate and explain to the learned Magistrate the circumstances under which she could not earlier appear before the learned Magistrate. I have no reason to assume that the learned Magistrate would not consider the petitioner's application for regular bail on merits in accordance with law and expeditiously. No special or specific directions appear to be necessary. Every court must do the same. Sufficient general directions on this aspect have already been issued in the decisions reported in Sukumari v. State of Kerala (2001 (1) KLT 22) and Alice George v. Deputy Superintendent of Police (2003 (1) KLT 339).

3. In the result, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed; but with the observation that if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Magistrate and seeks bail, after giving sufficient prior notice to B.A. NO. 4450 OF 2007 -: 3 :- the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself. Sd/-

(R. BASANT, JUDGE)

Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.