Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

K.K.ISMAIL, AGED 47 YEARS versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


K.K.ISMAIL, AGED 47 YEARS v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE - Crl MC No. 2239 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 13901 (24 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 2239 of 2007()

1. K.K.ISMAIL, AGED 47 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.JOY GEORGE

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :24/07/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

= = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.M.C. No.2239 Of 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Dated this the 24th day of July, 2007

ORDER

The petitioner claims to be the registered owner of a vehicle Swaraj Mazda Lorry bearing Registration No. KL 02/ N 2728. Alleging that the said vehicle was used for illicit transfer of wheat, it was seized in Crime No.409/2007 of Thodupuzha Police Station. The petitioner applied for release of the vehicle. That prayer was rejected by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate by Annexure A7(a) order. The petitioner has come to this Court aggrieved by the said order ie. Annexure A7(a).

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is undisputedly the owner of the vehicle. No confiscation proceedings has been initiated so far. Subject to the liability to make the vehicle available for confiscation if a proper order of confiscation is ultimately passed under the provisions of Essential Commodities Act or the Code to Criminal Procedure the vehicle may now be released to the petitioner subject to appropriate conditions, prays the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned Public Prosecutor does not raise any objections. He only submits that appropriate conditions may be imposed to ensure that the vehicle will be available before the Court and the authorities concerned, if and when the order is ultimately B.A.No.2239 of 2007 2 passed for confiscation under the provisions of the Essential Commodities Act or otherwise.

3. I am satisfied that the prayer of the petitioner can be allowed and appropriate conditions can be issued. In the result, this petition is allowed. Annexure A7(a) is set aside. It is directed that the vehicle shall be released to the petitioner on the following terms and conditions.

i) He shall produce before the learned Magistrate all documents to show that he is the registered owner entitled to the possession of the vehicle. ii) He shall execute a bond for an amount equal to the value of the vehicle to be fixed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, along with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate. iii) In such bond he shall specifically undertake to produce the vehicle before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate or before the appropriate authority under the Essential Commodities Act, if any order of confiscation were ultimately passed, and he is called upon to produce the vehicle.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

sj B.A.No.2239 of 2007 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.