Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY versus M/S. MAHUL HAM AGENCIES

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY v. M/S. MAHUL HAM AGENCIES - ST Rev No. 553 of 2004 [2007] RD-KL 14223 (26 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

ST Rev No. 553 of 2004()

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Petitioner

Vs

1. M/S. MAHUL HAM AGENCIES,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

For Respondent :DR.K.B.MUHAMED KUTTY (SR.)

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

Dated :26/07/2007

O R D E R

H.L. DATTU, C.J. & K.T. SANKARAN, J.

................................................................................... SALES TAX REVISION CASE No. 553 OF 2004 & C.M. APPLICATION NO. 1348 OF 2004 ...................................................................................

Dated this the 26th July, 2007

O R D E R

H.L. Dattu, C.J.: This Revision Case is filed against the order in T.A.No. 672 of 2002 dated 6th June, 2003, for the assessment year 1998-99.

2. In filing the Revision Case, there is an enormous delay of 322 days.

3. Along with the application to condone the delay, an affidavit is also filed. In the affidavit so filed, except saying that the papers were moving from table to table, no other explanation is offered to condone the delay in filing the Sales Tax Revision Case. The explanation offered in the affidavit, in our opinion, is fully unsatisfactory. Therefore, the said explanation cannot be accepted by us.

4. Accordingly, the application to condone the delay in filing the Sales Tax Revision Case requires to be rejected and it is rejected.

5. Consequent to the rejection of the application to condone the delay in filing the Sales Tax Revision Case, the Sales Tax Revision Case is also rejected. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE. K.T. SANKARAN,

JUDGE.

lk


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.