C.G.PAVANAJAN, S/O. LATE GOPALAN versus P.K.PRABHAKARAN, S/O. GOPALAN

High Court of Kerala

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

C.G.PAVANAJAN, S/O. LATE GOPALAN v. P.K.PRABHAKARAN, S/O. GOPALAN - WP(C) No. 23103 of 2007(A) [2007] RD-KL 14250 (27 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 23103 of 2007(A)

1. C.G.PAVANAJAN, S/O. LATE GOPALAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. P.K.PRABHAKARAN, S/O. GOPALAN,
... Respondent

2. P.K.PARVATHY, W/O. GOPALAN,

3. C.G.VODINY, W/O. AMBUJAKSHAN,

4. C.G.VANAJA, W/O. SASIDHARAN,

5. C.G.KOMALAN, W/O. SUDHAKARAN,

For Petitioner :SRI.SIMON LUIZ

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

Dated :27/07/2007

O R D E R

M.N.KRISHNAN, J.

WP(C)No.23103 OF 2007 A

Dated this the 27th July, 2007.

JUDGMENT

The writ petitioner moved an application before the Munsiff, Ernakulam requesting to summon or give direction to the Assistant Director Central Survey Office, Survey and Land Records to provide him the old survey sketch and plan of the properties of the plaint A schedule comprised in survey No:41/11A and plaint B schedule property. It is true that the prayer to have such a copy from the District Survey Superintendent was allowed but he filed a report to the effect that the said document is not in his custody and is not available. Now the plaintiff wants to make an attempt to get it from the Assistant Director, Survey and Land Records Office. It appears from the contention raised in the case that the survey plan and sketch (with reference to old survey) is necessary for a proper determination of the case. It is better not to shut out and refuse opportunity to the plaintiff to get such a document, if it is really available. Therefore, the order under challenge is set aside and the learned Munsiff is directed to issue direction to the Assistant Director Central Survey Office, Survey and Land Records to issue a copy of the survey sketch and plan as prayed for, if it is available in his  WPC 23103/07 2 custody or otherwise to file a statement to that effect so that the matter can be proceeded further with. It may also be stated that the Assistant Director shall comply with the directions within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the summons from the court below. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N.KRISHNAN Judge jj 

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.