High Court of Kerala
Case Law Search
M.MANOJ BABU, CHANDRODAYAM v. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER - WP(C) No. 16617 of 2007(C)  RD-KL 14292 (27 July 2007)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMWP(C) No. 16617 of 2007(C)
1. M.MANOJ BABU, CHANDRODAYAM,
2. M.LALITHAMBIKA, CHANDRODAYAM, T.C.48/668
1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
2. DIRECTOR OF SURVEY,
3. SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY,
4. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, RESURVEY OFFICE,
5. TAHASILDAR, NEYYATTINKARA.
6. VILLAGE OFFICER, VIZHINJAM.
For Petitioner :SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN
O R D E R
S. SIRI JAGAN, J.W.P.(C)NO. 16617 OF 2007
DATED THIS THE DAY OF JULY, 2007
The petitioners are challenging proceedings under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act as evidenced by Exts.P7 and P8 to which the 1st petitioner has already filed Ext.P9 objections. The petitioners submit that before passing final orders in the matter, the petitioners are sought to be evicted. The petitioners, therefore, seek appropriate reliefs in this writ petition.
2. I have heard the learned Government pleader also. Now that the 1st petitioner has filed Ext.P9 objections to Exts.P7 and P8, it is appropriate that the concerned Tahsildar passes orders after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners, which shall include an opportunity to adduce evidence also. Thereafter, the Tahsildar shall pass a speaking order after considering the objections of the petitioners in the light of the evidence to be adduced by them. Till after 7 days of communication of such orders the petitioners shall not be evicted from the property in question. The writ petition is disposed of as above.
S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGEAcd
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.