Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

LEELA KUNJU KUNJU, BALLAPADATH HOUSE versus THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


LEELA KUNJU KUNJU, BALLAPADATH HOUSE v. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT - WP(C) No. 12132 of 2007(T) [2007] RD-KL 14791 (2 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 12132 of 2007(T)

1. LEELA KUNJU KUNJU, BALLAPADATH HOUSE,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.K.R.KURUP

For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

Dated :02/08/2007

O R D E R

S. SIRI JAGAN, J.

W.P.(C)NO.12132 OF 2007

DATED THIS THE 2nd DAY OF AUGUST, 2007



JUDGMENT

The complaint of the petitioner in this writ petition is that despite Exts.P4 and P7 judgments, by which this Court had directed settling of timings without inviting fresh objections, the respondent has again by Ext.P8 convened a timing conference and invited objections.

2. The learned Government pleader deriving support from the counter affidavit submits that Ext.P8 is not a notice inviting fresh objections but it is only a notice for the timing conference to be held pursuant to Ext.P7 judgment.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner points out that in Ext.P7 judgment dated 1.1.2007, the respondent was directed to pass orders within a period to three months, which has not been done and no application for extension of time has also been filed by the respondent.

4. I have heard both sides in detail. Although I am not happy with the conduct of the respondent in so far he has not cared to comply with Ext. P7 judgment within the time stipulated and has not even cared to apply for extension of time, to avoid all W.P.(c)No.12132/07 2 controversies, I direct that the direction in Ext.P7 judgment shall be complied with in letter and spirit without calling for any objections or without considering any fresh objections, which have been received after 1.1.2007, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

Acd W.P.(c)No.12132/07 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.