Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SUDHARSANAN, S/O.KRISHNA PILLAI versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SUDHARSANAN, S/O.KRISHNA PILLAI v. STATE OF KERALA - Crl MC No. 2484 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 14943 (3 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 2484 of 2007()

1. SUDHARSANAN, S/O.KRISHNA PILLAI,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.G.SUDHEER

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :03/08/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

Crl.M.C.No.2484 of 2007

Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2007

O R D E R

Petitioner faces allegations under Section 55 of the Kerala Abkari Act. The co-accused has already been tried, found not guilty and acquitted. The case against the petitioner has been split up. Consequent to the non appearance of the petitioner, a warrant of arrest issued by the Additional Sessions Judge for trial of Abkari Act Cases, Neyyattinkara is chasing him. The case has now been transferred to the list of Long Pending Cases. According to the petitioner, he is absolutely innocent. His absence earlier was not wilful. The petitioner is now willing to appear and apply for bail and co-operate with the court for expeditious disposal of the case. The petitioner apprehends that his application for bail may not be considered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. It is therefore prayed that directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C may be issued in favour of the petitioner.

2. It is for the petitioner to appear before the learned Additional Sessions Judge and explain to the learned Judge the circumstances under which he could not earlier appear before the Crl.M.C.No.2484 of 2007 2 learned Judge. I have no reason to assume that the learned Additional Sessions Judge would not consider such application on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. Every court must do the same. No special or specific direction appears to be necessary. Sufficient general directions have already been issued in Alice George v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police [2003(1) KLT 339].

3. This Crl.M.C is, in these circumstances, dismissed, but with the specific observation that if the petitioner appears before the learned Additional Sessions Judge and applies for bail after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Additional Sessions Judge must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

rtr/- //true copy// PA to Judge Crl.M.C.No.2484 of 2007 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.