Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

T.K. NARAYANAN, S/O. KRISHNAYYAR versus THE STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


T.K. NARAYANAN, S/O. KRISHNAYYAR v. THE STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 4688 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 14949 (3 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4688 of 2007()

1. T.K. NARAYANAN, S/O. KRISHNAYYAR,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.C.A.CHACKO

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :03/08/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

B.A.No.4688 of 2007

Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2007

ORDER

The petitioner faces indictment in a prosecution for offences punishable, inter alia, under Sections 447 and 427 I.P.C. Investigation is complete. Final report has already been filed. Cognizance has been taken. Consequent to non appearance of the petitioner before the learned Magistrate, the learned Magistrate has issued a non bailable warrant to procure the presence of the petitioner. The petitioner finds the warrant of arrest issued by the learned Magistrate chasing him.

2. According to the petitioner, he is innocent. His absence was not wilful. The petitioner is willing to appear and apply for bail and co-operate with the court for expeditious disposal of the case. The petitioner apprehends that his application for bail may not be considered by the learned Magistrate on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. It is therefore prayed that directions under Section 438 Cr.P.C may be issued in favour of the petitioner.

3. It is for the petitioner to appear before the learned Magistrate and explain to the learned Magistrate the circumstances under which he could not earlier appear before the learned Magistrate. I have no reason to assume that the learned Magistrate would not B.A.No.4688 of 2007 2 consider such application on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. Every court must do the same. No special or specific direction appears to be necessary. Sufficient general directions have already been issued in Alice George v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police [2003(1) KLT 339].

4. This application for anticipatory bail is, in these circumstances, dismissed, but with the specific observation that if the petitioner appears before the learned Magistrate and applies for bail after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

rtr/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.