Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M.GEORGE KURIAN, MANNAN CHERIL HOUSE versus SOUTHERN RAILWAY, CHENNAI REPRESENTED

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M.GEORGE KURIAN, MANNAN CHERIL HOUSE v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY, CHENNAI REPRESENTED - WP(C) No. 8294 of 2007(K) [2007] RD-KL 15013 (6 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 8294 of 2007(K)

1. M.GEORGE KURIAN, MANNAN CHERIL HOUSE,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. SOUTHERN RAILWAY, CHENNAI REPRESENTED
... Respondent

2. F.A. & C.A.O.(CONSTRUCTION)

3. AAO/BILLS/CN/MS, SOUTHERN RAILWAY,

4. CATHOLIC CYRIAN BANK LTD.,

For Petitioner :SRI.T.RAJESH

For Respondent :SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS, SC,RAILWAYS

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

Dated :06/08/2007

O R D E R

S. SIRI JAGAN, J.

W.P.(C)NO.8294 OF 2007

DATED THIS THE 6th DAY OF AUGUST, 2007



JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached this Court seeking a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to disburse certain amounts due to his late father, who was a contractor, from respondents 1 and 2 .

2. The learned standing counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submits that the bank guarantee, which is the subject matter of the writ petition has been handed over to the petitioner on 25.4.07 duly discharged and therefore, it is for the petitioner to take up the matter with the 4th respondent.

3. The petitioner submits that the 4th respondent is not taking steps to release the amounts covered by the bank guarantee, which has been deposited for obtaining the bank guarantee in view of lack of intimation from the 3rd respondent. Now that respondents 1 and 2 have already discharged the bank guarantee, the 3rd respondent shall issue proper intimation to the 4th respondent stating that the bank guarantee has been discharged and they have no objection in disbursing the amount covered by bank guarantee to the petitioner if W.P.(c)No.8294/07 2 such amounts are due. This shall be done within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

Acd


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.