Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ANSELKUTTY T., S/O. LATE A.THOMAS versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


ANSELKUTTY T., S/O. LATE A.THOMAS v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - WP(C) No. 32507 of 2006(T) [2007] RD-KL 1508 (19 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 32507 of 2006(T)

1. ANSELKUTTY T., S/O. LATE A.THOMAS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL

3. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,

4. THE REGIONAL OFFICER,

For Petitioner :SRI.R.SATISH KUMAR

For Respondent :SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.K.DENESAN

Dated :19/01/2007

O R D E R

K.K. DENESAN, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 32507 OF 2006 T = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Dated this the 19th January, 2007



J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, admittedly, is a candidate included in the rank list published by the Public Service Commission for appointment to the post of Junior Health Inspector Grade II in the Municipal Common Service. The rank of the petitioner is No. 1 in the supplementary list of OX candidates. According to the petitioner, the Commission failed to advise sufficient number of candidates against vacancies reported prior to the cancellation of the list on 31-12-2004.

2. Counsel for the Commission with reference to the statements contained in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondents 3 and 4 submits that altogether 389 vacancies were reported and the Commission has advised candidates against all vacancies reported prior to 31-12-2004 including N.J.D. vacancies. OX candidates are entitled to get appointment based on reservation only against one per cent of the vacancies. Their place in a 100 point WPC No.32507 /2006 -2- roster is 48. The Commission advised candidates upto 312 in the main list. There are 3 more candidates belonging to OX category in the main list. Therefore only if 100 more vacancies are reported the next candidate in the main list belonging to OX category can expect to get advice for appointment. Therefore the petitioner does not have even the remotest chance of getting appointment. Vacancies, if any, reported to the Commission after 31-12-2004 cannot be utilised for advising candidates from the list that stands cancelled. Hence there is no scope for granting reliefs to the petitioner. The writ petition is therefore dismissed. K.K. DENESAN

JUDGE

jan/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.