High Court of Kerala
Case Details
Case Law Search
Judgement
SREEDEVI v. T.A. DASAN - MFA No. 1057 of 2001 [2007] RD-KL 15146 (7 August 2007)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MFA No. 1057 of 2001()1. SREEDEVI
... Petitioner
Vs
1. T.A. DASAN
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.ANCHAL C.VIJAYAN
For Respondent :SRI.MATHEWS JACOB
The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.B.KOSHY
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI
Dated :07/08/2007
O R D E R
J.B.KOSHY & V.GIRI,JJ.
M.F.A.NO.1057 of 2001Dated this the 7th day of August, 2007.
JUDGMENT
KOSHY,J.
The husband of the first appellant, at the age of 33 years, met with a serious motor accident on 16.8.1993 and he died, due to the injuries suffered in the accident. A claim petition was filed by the widow of the deceased, along with two minor children, claiming a compensation of Rs.10,70,000/-. The tribunal found that the accident occurred due to the negligence of the driver of the lorry insured by the 2nd respondent insurance company. However, the tribunal awarded only a total compensation of Rs.1,99,700/-. The quantum of compensation is disputed in this appeal.2. It is the contention of the appellants that the deceased was drawing Rs.3,000/- per month as an Accountant and Auditor and a certificate was also produced to that effect. The tribunal did not accept the same as the M.F.A.NO.1057 of 2001 person who issued the certificate was not examined. Apart from the production of S.S.L.C book, the appellants have not produced any other certificate showing that the deceased was having any special educational qualification to work as an Accountant. Any way, he must have been writing accounts in the jewelery shop.
3. Considering the fact that the accident occurred in 1993 and he was maintaining a family (wife and two small children), we fix Rs.1,800/- as his monthly income. If that be so, the loss of dependency can be calculated at Rs.1,200/- per month. The tribunal has taken 17 as the multiplier, taking guidelines from the second schedule. The three member bench in Smt.Supe Dei & ors v. M/s.National Insurance Company & Anr. {JT 2002 (Suppl. 1) SC 451} held that Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, though framed for determining the claim made under Section 163 A, it can also be taken as a guideline while determining the compensation under Section 166 of the Act. Even though it is argued that considering the M.F.A.NO.1057 of 2001 present life span, a higher multiplier ought to have been adopted, we are of the view that no enhancement is necessary. According to us, the correct multiplier has been adopted. If that be so, the compensation payable will be: 1200 x 12 x 17 = Rs.2,44,800/-. The tribunal has awarded Rs.1,63,200/- on account of loss of dependency. The balance amount payable by the insurance company will be Rs.81,600/-.
4. It is argued that the wife was only aged 26 years at the time of accident and there is nobody to look after them and they are helpless. The appellants contend that the compensation awarded on all other counts are very small. But, considering the total compensation awarded, we are not inclined to enhance the compensation on any other count. The additional compensation of Rs.81,600/- should be deposited by the 2nd respondent insurance company with 7.5% interest from the date of application, till the date of deposit. On deposit of the above amount, Rs.25,000/- can be withdrawn by the first appellant widow of the deceased, M.F.A.NO.1057 of 2001 and the balance should be deposited equally in the name of the minor children, so as to fetch maximum rate of interest in a Nationalised Bank till they attain majority. Appeal is allowed to the above extent. Sd/- (J.B.KOSHY)
JUDGE
Sd/- (V.GIRI)JUDGE
sk/ //true copy// M.F.A.NO.1057 of 2001J.B.KOSHY & V.GIRI,JJ.
M.F.A.NO.1057 of 2001JUDGMENT
7th August, 2007.
Copyright
Advertisement
Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.