Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

P.R.SADANANDAN, S/O.V.M.KUNHIRAMAN versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


P.R.SADANANDAN, S/O.V.M.KUNHIRAMAN v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE - WP(C) No. 35704 of 2005(A) [2007] RD-KL 15234 (8 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 35704 of 2005(A)

1. P.R.SADANANDAN, S/O.V.M.KUNHIRAMAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent

2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS,

3. ACCOUNTS OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE

For Petitioner :SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

Dated :08/08/2007

O R D E R

ANTONY DOMINIC,J.

W.P ( C) No.35704 of 2005

Dated this the 8th day of August, 2007



J U D G M E N T

Petitioner has retired from the service of the Panchayat Department on 31.5.2002. The prayer in this writ petition is to direct the respondents to disburse the Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity and arrears of pay arising out of pay revision. Pursuant to the interim order passed on 21.2.2005, Counsel for the petitioner submits that the arrears of DCRG have already been released. Now what remains is the petitioner's claim for arrears arising out of pay revision and interest claimed thereon. I notice that highlighting his grievances, petitioner has filed Ext.P4 representation before respondents 1 and 2 and the counsel submits that the representations are still pending. After hearing both sides, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit-P4, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. I clarify that what survives to be considered in Ext. P4 is only the claim regarding pay revision arrears and claim for interest. Before final orders are passed, petitioner shall be given notice and an opportunity to be heard, if he so desires.

(ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE)

ma

K.THANKAPPAN,J

CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999

ORDER

25th May, 2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.