Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MOHAMMED NIYAS K.P. versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


MOHAMMED NIYAS K.P. v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 4862 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 15415 (10 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4862 of 2007()

1. MOHAMMED NIYAS K.P.,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.V.RAJAGOPAL

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :10/08/2007

O R D E R

R. BASANT, J.

B.A. No. 4862 OF 2007

Dated this the 10th day of August, 2007

ORDER

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner is alleged to have forged a mark list before the Rajeev Gandhi University fraudulently making it appear that he is eligible to join the course, whereas he had failed in his Plus 2 examination. The authorities felt suspicion. The matter was referred to the concerned authorities. It was confirmed that it was a case of forgery. A crime has been registered. Investigation is pending. The petitioner apprehends imminent arrest. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, though not a juvenile, is very close to the rubicon of 18 years. In these circumstances, anticipatory bail may be granted to the petitioner, it is prayed.

2. This application is opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that there B.A. No. 4862 OF 2007 -: 2 :- are no circumstances justifying the invocation of the discretion under Sec.438 of the Cr.P.C. I find merit in the opposition by the learned Public Prosecutor. This is a fit case where the petitioner must appear before the Investigating Officer or the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction and then seek regular bail in the ordinary course. I have no reason to assume that the learned Magistrate would not consider the petitioner's application for regular bail on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. No special or specific directions appear to be necessary. Every court must do the same.

3. In the result, this bail application is dismissed; but with the observation that if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Magistrate and seeks bail, after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits and expeditiously. Sd/-

(R. BASANT, JUDGE)

Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge B.A. No. 4862 OF 2007 -: 3 :-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.