Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BABU, S/O.NARAYANAN versus THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BABU, S/O.NARAYANAN v. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED - Crl MC No. 26 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 155 (3 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 26 of 2007()

1. BABU, S/O.NARAYANAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED
... Respondent

2. THE DETECTIVE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.C.A.CHACKO

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :03/01/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

Crl.M.C.No.26 of 2007

Dated this the 3rd day of January 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner, whose application for anticipatory bail was dismissed by another bench of this court, as per order dated 20/12/2006, has come to this court now for enlargement of time for appearance before the investigating officer. The relevant observations appear in paragraph 3 of the order dated 20/12/2006 which I extract below:

"Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to a person like the petitioner. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the investigating officer and then apply for regular bail. The petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer within one week from today for the purpose of custodial interrogation and recovery of documents, if any. Thereafter, the petitioner shall be produced before the Magistrate having jurisdiction who shall consider and dispose of his application for regular bail, if any, filed by the petitioner, preferably on the same day on which it is filed."

2. The petitioner wants extension of time. He could not appear before the investigating officer within a period of seven days stipulated in the order. Crl.M.C.No.26/07 2

3. I find no merit in the prayer for extension of time. The petitioner can, at any time, appear before the investigating officer or the learned Magistrate and seek bail. Needless to say, if the petitioner appears and applies for bail before the learned Magistrate after giving sufficient prior notice to the Public Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must pass appropriate orders on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously.

4. With the above observation, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is dismissed.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr Crl.M.C.No.26/07 3 Crl.M.C.No.26/07 4

R.BASANT, J

C.R.R.P.No.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF JULY 2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.