Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BABY ALEX, AGED 40 versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BABY ALEX, AGED 40 v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 4880 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 15592 (14 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4880 of 2007()

1. BABY ALEX, AGED 40,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :14/08/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

= = = = = = = = = = = = = B.A.No.4880 of 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Dated this the 14th day of August, 2007

ORDER

Second application for anticipatory bail. Earlier application filed by the petitioner for anticipatory bail was dismissed as per order dated 19.6.07 in B.A.No.3666/07. The petitioner has now come forward with this second application for anticipatory bail. What is the change in circumstances? This second application for anticipatory bail can be entertained by this court only if satisfactory change of circumstances is shown to exist. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the investigation is almost complete. Investigators are satisfied that the petitioner is not the principal accused. Notice was given to the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the application. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that there is no change in circumstances at all. It is incorrect to say that the investigation is complete. It is not at all correct to say that the Investigators have come to the conclusion that the petitioner is innocent. There are circumstances which point to the complicity of the petitioner. B.A.No.4880 of 2007 2

2. I find merit in the opposition by the learned Public Prosecutor. There are no features suggesting the need for invocation of the extraordinary equitable discretion under Section 438 Cr.P.C. This is a fit case where the petitioner must appear before the learned Magistrate and seek regular bail in the ordinary and normal course.

3. In the result, this petition is dismissed. I may however, hasten to observe that if the petitioner appears before the Investigating Officer or the learned Magistrate and applies for bail, after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

sj /TRUE COPY/

P.A.TO JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.