Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SANKARA PANDIAN @ DURAI versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SANKARA PANDIAN @ DURAI v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 4947 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 15691 (14 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4947 of 2007()

1. SANKARA PANDIAN @ DURAI
... Petitioner

2. HASSAN,S/O. IBRAHIM, HOUSE NO. 145,

3. JOSEPH JOHN, S/O. JOSEPH,

4. AYYAPPAN,S/O. PONNAYYAN, DOOR NO. II/178

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.C.RAJENDRAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :14/08/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J.

B.A.No.4947 of 2007

Dated this the 14th day of August 2007

O R D E R

Application for regular bail. Petitioners are accused 3 to 5 and 7. A large quantity of counterfeit currency notes were recovered from the possession of accused 1 and 2 - spouses. Their interrogation led the police to accused 3 to 7 through whom accused 1 and 2 had allegedly come into the possession of the counterfeit currency notes. The petitioners were arrested on 16/7/2007. Investigation is in progress.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are absolutely innocent. No recovery of any counterfeit currency notes has been effected from the possession of any one of the petitioners. The petitioners have remained in custody from 16/7/2007. They may not be compelled to remain in custody any longer, submits the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the application. The allegations are serious. Detailed investigation B.A.No.4947/07 2 has got to be conducted. The leads obtained by the questioning of the arrested accused have to be followed up. It is too early to consider the release of the petitioners now. In a serious crime like the instant one, the investigators are entitled for reasonable further time to complete the investigation after arrest, submits the learned Public Prosecutor. Having considered all the relevant inputs, I find merit in the opposition by the learned Public Prosecutor. The investigators are certainly entitled for reasonable further time to complete the investigation. I am satisfied that the petitioners do not deserve to be enlarged on bail at this early stage of investigation.

4. In the result, this petition is dismissed. However, I may hasten to observe that the petitioners shall be at liberty to move this court or the courts below for bail again at later stages of the investigation not, at any rate, prior to 25/08/2007. The investigating officer shall, in the meantime, make every endeavour to complete the investigation.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge B.A.No.4947/07 3 B.A.No.4947/07 4

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.