Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SREEKRISHNAN, S/O.ARUMUGHAN PILLAI versus VILANANCHATHANOOR SERVICE CO

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SREEKRISHNAN, S/O.ARUMUGHAN PILLAI v. VILANANCHATHANOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE - WP(C) No. 17073 of 2007(G) [2007] RD-KL 15699 (14 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 17073 of 2007(G)

1. SREEKRISHNAN, S/O.ARUMUGHAN PILLAI,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. VILANANCHATHANOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE
... Respondent

2. THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER,

3. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL),

For Petitioner :SRI.V.V.ASOKAN

For Respondent :SRI.N.RAGHURAJ

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

Dated :14/08/2007

O R D E R

K.M.JOSEPH, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C).No. 17073 OF 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 14th day of August, 2007



JUDGMENT

Petitioner availed a loan which is not repaid. An award was passed. Petitioner challenges the consequential demand notice issued by the second respondent. Petitioner seeks a direction to the second respondent to give reasonable time to pay off the debt and to extend the benefits provided to the debtor as per Ext.P3 circular.

2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the Bank.

3. Learned counsel for Bank points out that the petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of Ext.P3 circular as prohibition in Ext.P3 is against the charge of rate higher than 100 % of the principal amount and in this case interest demanded is not in excess of double the amount and therefore the petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of the the circular.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that WPC No.17073/07 2 petitioner may be permitted to pay off the entire amount in easy instalments. Having regard to all facts, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to pay off the entire amount remaining to be paid with due interest in 7 equal monthly instalments, the first of which shall be payable on or before 15/09/2007. Petitioner has to pay the remaining instalments on or before the 15th of every succeeding months. The first respondent will serve a statement on the petitioner showing the amount payable by the petitioner with interest and also the amount of instalment payable on the basis that the amount is to be paid in 7 equal monthly instalments, within two weeks from today. If the petitioner does not pay any of the instalments as aforesaid, petitioner will lose the benefit of this judgment and it is open to the respondent-Bank to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law.

(K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)

sv. WPC No.17073/07 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.