High Court of Kerala
Case Law Search
P.N. PADMAVATHY, BALAKRISHNAPURAM v. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 401 of 2007  RD-KL 1584 (19 January 2007)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBail Appl No. 401 of 2007()
1. P.N. PADMAVATHY, BALAKRISHNAPURAM
2. V.B. JAYATHRI, DO. DO.
3. SUDHEERA RANI, DO. DO.
4. GOPAKUMAR, DO. DO.
5. KRISHNAVENI, DO. DO.
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
For Petitioner :SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR
O R D E R
B.A.No. 401 of 2007
Dated this the 19th day of January, 2007.
ORDERPetitioners, who are accused Nos. 4,5,6,8 and 9 in C.C.No.380 of 2001 on the file of the J.F.C.M., Paravoor for offences punishable under Sections 420, 463, 464 and 465 read with Section 34 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail.
2. Admittedly on account of the non-appearance of the petitioners before the J.F.C.M., Paravoor where the case is pending as C.C.No.380 of 2001, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioners. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioners surrender before the Magistrate and file an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the petitioners shall be released on bail on appropriate conditions. In the event of any breach of the conditions, it shall be open to the Magistrate to proceed according to law. This application is allowed as above. V.Ramkumar, Judge. ess 19/1
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.