High Court of Kerala
Case Law Search
PRIMA BEVERAGES LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA - OP No. 12023 of 2001(F)  RD-KL 15919 (17 August 2007)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMOP No. 12023 of 2001(F)
1. PRIMA BEVERAGES LIMITED
1. UNION OF INDIA
For Petitioner :SRI.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN
For Respondent :SENIOR CENTRAL GOVT. STANDING COUNCEL
The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN
O R D E R
H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.T.SANKARAN, J.O.P.No.12023 of 2001-F
Dated, this the 17th day of August, 2007
H.L.Dattu, C.J. Petitioner is an industrial unit engaged in the manufacture of purified drinking water. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
"a) declare that Exhibit P1 notification issued by the Central Government under Section 23 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act is ultra vires the powers of the Central Government under Section 23 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and therefore illegal and without jurisdiction.
b) declare that regulation No.6(2) of the Bureau of Indian Standards certification regulation insofar as it empowers the executive committee of the Bureau of Indian Standards to levy marking fee on any product sought to be certified by the Bureau is beyond the powers of the Bureau of Indian Standards under Section 15(2) read with Section 38(2)(e) of the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986.
c) award the cost of this petition to the petitioner; and
d) grant such other reliefs as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case." (2) This Court while entertaining the original petition had granted an interim order. The said interim order reads as under: "Heard both sides.
The Original Petition is being recommended for placing before a Bench. In order that the petitioner may maintain status quo, until appropriate orders are obtained from the Bench, there will be an interim order as prayed for operative till 11.4.2001." (3) The said interim order granted by this Court was extended by six weeks at the first instance, and thereafter it was extended by one month. O.P.No.12023/2001 2 (4) During the pendency of the original petition, we are informed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, that the petitioner has complied with the notification issued by the Union of India. (5) In view of the above, as on today, the relief sought for by the petitioner in this original petition does not survive for consideration of this Court and accordingly it is disposed of as having become unnecessary. (6) It is made clear that the respondents shall not initiate any prosecution proceedings against the petitioner during the period of stay that was operating against them. (7) Consequently, C.M.P.Nos.19223 and 25083 of 2001 are also dismissed. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (K.T.SANKARAN)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.