Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SENSON A.J., LAB ASSISTANT versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SENSON A.J., LAB ASSISTANT v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE - WP(C) No. 21225 of 2007(B) [2007] RD-KL 15932 (17 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 21225 of 2007(B)

1. SENSON A.J., LAB ASSISTANT,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY

3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

4. THE CORPORATE MANAGER,

5. PANCHAMI DAVIS, U.P.S.A., R.P.U.P.S.,

6. LAIJI FRANCIS, U.P.S.A.,

7. THE ASST.EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VALAPPADU.

For Petitioner :SRI.MVS.NAMBOOTHIRY

For Respondent :SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

Dated :17/08/2007

O R D E R

A.K. BASHEER, J.

W.P.(C). NOS. 21225 & 24475 OF 2007

Dated this the 17th day of August, 2007



J U D G M E N T

These two writ petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment since the parties and the issues involved in them are the same.

2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the materials available on record, I am satisfied that Ext.P3 in W.P.(C) No.24475/07 which is an order issued by the District Educational Officer, Irinjalakkuda, is liable to be quashed for the sole reason that the petitioners in the said writ petition was not heard. It is not in dispute that Ext.P3 will result in adverse consequences, as far as the petitioner in this case is concerned. It is true that petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 21225/07 is seeking implementation of the said order passed by the DEO, a copy of which has been produced as Ext.P9 in that writ petition. In the above facts and circumstances, Ext.P3 order issued by the DEO, Irinjalakkuda, (Ext.P9 in W.P. (C) No. 21225/07) is quashed. The said officer shall pass fresh orders in the matter, after WPC NOS. 21225 & 24475/07 Page numbers affording sufficient opportunity to be heard to the petitioners in these two writ petitions, and the manager as well as all other teachers who are likely to be affected by the order that may be passed, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In the meanwhile no fresh appointments shall be made in the school pending final decision in the matter. The writ petitions are disposed of as above.

A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE

vps WPC NOS. 21225 & 24475/07 Page numbers

A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE

OP NO.20954/00

JUDGMENT

1ST MARCH, 2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.