Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ABDUL WAHID, MANAGER, H.S. versus STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


ABDUL WAHID, MANAGER, H.S. v. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY - OP No. 15815 of 2002(G) [2007] RD-KL 15979 (18 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

OP No. 15815 of 2002(G)

1. ABDUL WAHID, MANAGER, H.S.,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SMT.V.P.SEEMANDINI

For Respondent :SRI.V.K.BEERAN, ADDL.ADVOCATE GENERAL

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

Dated :18/08/2007

O R D E R

H.L. DATTU, C.J. & K.T. SANKARAN, J.

................................................................................... ORIGINAL PETITION No. 15815 OF 2002 ...................................................................................

Dated this the 18th August, 2007



J U D G M E N T

H.L. Dattu, C.J.: Petitioner is the Manager of an Aided Vocational Higher Secondary School functioning in Punalur Educational Sub District in Kollam District.

2. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

"a) Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent to sanction Plus Two course to the petitioner's school during the Academic year 2002- 2003 on the basis of the High Level Committee Report dt. 22.09.1998 as also the District Level Committee report prepared in the year 2000 and also on the basis of the direction issued by the learned single Judge of this Hon'ble Court in Ext.P1 Judgment; and

b) Pass such other and further orders as are deemed just and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. At the time of hearing of this Original Petition, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as on today, the reliefs sought for in this Petition would not survive for consideration of this Court.

4. Taking note of the submission made by the learned counsel for the ORIGINAL PETITION No. 15815 OF 2002 2 petitioner, the Original Petition is disposed of as having become unnecessary. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to make appropriate representations before the appropriate authorities for appropriate reliefs.

5. C.M.P.No. 26815 of 2002 is also disposed of. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE. K.T. SANKARAN,

JUDGE.

lk ORIGINAL PETITION No. 15815 OF 2002 3 H.L. DATTU, C.J.&

K.T. SANKARAN, J.

........................................................ O.P. No. 15815 OF 2002 .........................................................

Dated this the 18th August, 2007



J U D G M E N T


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.