Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M.K. ANTAPPAN, AGED 46 YEARS versus PUTHENVELIKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M.K. ANTAPPAN, AGED 46 YEARS v. PUTHENVELIKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH - WP(C) No. 25194 of 2007(Y) [2007] RD-KL 16092 (20 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 25194 of 2007(Y)

1. M.K. ANTAPPAN, AGED 46 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. PUTHENVELIKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.SABU GEORGE

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

Dated :20/08/2007

O R D E R

A.K. BASHEER, J.

W.P.(C). NO. 25194 OF 2007

Dated this the 20th day of August, 2007



J U D G M E N T

Petitioner contends that he has submitted Ext.P1 application before the respondent/Panchayat requesting for grant of licence to conduct a poultry farm. It is admitted by the petitioner that he has already started operation of the farm. The question whether petitioner has authority to do so without obtaining permission and licence from the Panchayat, is a matter to be looked into by the said statutory authority. It is also contended by the petitioner that the local residents have no objection in starting the farm in that area and that they have given consent to do the same, as can be seen from Ext.P2. It is for the Panchayat to verify the same. Anyhow, the only prayer in this writ petition is to issue an appropriate direction to the Panchayat to take a decision on Ext.P1 expeditiously.

2. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 strictly on its merit and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within WPC NO.25194/07 Page numbers one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that I have not considered the merit of any of the contentions raised by the petitioner. It will be open to the Panchayat to take a decision after affording sufficient opportunity to the petitioner to be heard. Petitioners shall produce a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the respondent for compliance.

A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE

vps WPC NO.25194/07 Page numbers

A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE

OP NO.20954/00

JUDGMENT

1ST MARCH, 2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.