Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PERIYA KARUPPAYYA, S/O.RAMAYYA versus STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


PERIYA KARUPPAYYA, S/O.RAMAYYA v. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 5084 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 16216 (21 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5084 of 2007()

1. PERIYA KARUPPAYYA, S/O.RAMAYYA,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :21/08/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

= = = = = = = = = = = = = B.A.No.5084 of 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Dated this the 21st day of August, 2007

ORDER

Application for regular bail. Petitioner is the first accused. Crime has been registered under the provisions of Wild life (Protection) Act. The crux of the allegations is that the petitioner along with co-accused was found to be in possession of tiger skin in violation of the provisions of the Wild life (Protection) Act. The petitioner was arrested on 3.08.07. He continues in custody from that date. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is absolutely innocent. Even accepting the allegations raised by the prosecution, what was seized was not genuine tiger skin at all. It was the skin of some other animal painted fraudulently to make it appear to be the skin of a tiger.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays, the learned Public Prosecutor does not oppose the said prayer and I am satisfied that the petitioner can now be enlarged on bail subject to appropriate conditions.

3. In the result, this petition is allowed. The petitioner B.A.No.5084 of 2007 2 shall be released on bail on the following terms and conditions:

i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate. iii) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation before the Investigating Officer between 10 a.m and 12 noon on all Mondays and Fridays, for a period of three months. Thereafter, he shall make himself available for interrogation as and when directed by the investigating officer in writing to do so.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

sj


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.