Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

V.VIKRAMAN, RECORD KEEPER versus B.RAJENDRAN NAIR

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


V.VIKRAMAN, RECORD KEEPER v. B.RAJENDRAN NAIR - CRP No. 208 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 16677 (4 September 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

CRP No. 208 of 2007()

1. V.VIKRAMAN, RECORD KEEPER,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. B.RAJENDRAN NAIR,
... Respondent

2. REVATHY S.PILLAI, D/O.LEELAMMA,

3. K.JAYAPRAKASH NARAYANAN,

For Petitioner :SRI.G.SUDHEER KARAKONAM

For Respondent :SRI.P.A.AHAMMED

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

Dated :04/09/2007

O R D E R

M.N.KRISHNAN,J


================
C.R.P.No.208 of 2007
=================

Dated this the 4th day of September, 2007

ORDER

This writ petition is preferred by the third judgment debtor in E.P.No.298/2004 in O.S.No.2021/1998. The third judgment debtor is a Government employee. His contention is that though he was employed in the Accountant General Office his carry home pay is only zero and therefore, he has no means to pay and therefore, he could not be arrested and send to Civil Prison. He produced a document Ext.B1 which does not have any authenticity. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner had shown the same to me and it is seen that the carry home salary is zero. If really a person is not having means to pay, then law does not permit him to be arrested and be sent to Civil Prison. The learned counsel prays time to produce authenticated documents I feel an opportunity has to be given. The decree holder is also heard. Therefore, the order under challenge is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the executing court for fresh consideration. The revision petitioner shall take steps to summon the documents to prove his salary as well as the C.R.P.No.208 of 2007 deduction from his office and prove it in accordance with law. The decree holder is also permitted to produce documentary as well as oral evidence in support of the contention and the other legal contentions which he is entitled in law to raise. The parties are directed to appear before the court below on 4.10.2007 and the learned Munsiff is directed to dispose of the matter within a period of ten weeks from the date of first appearance before the court.

M.N.KRISHNAN,JUDGE

dvs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.