Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJU, AGED 38 versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


RAJU, AGED 38 v. STATE OF KERALA - Crl MC No. 2806 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 16946 (7 September 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 2806 of 2007()

1. RAJU, AGED 38,
... Petitioner

2. BINU, AGED 31,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.R.ARUN RAJ

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :07/09/2007

O R D E R

R. BASANT, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Crl.M.C.No. 2806 of 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 7th day of September, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioners have come to this Court aggrieved by the onerous nature of the conditions imposed on them when regular bail was granted to them by the learned Magistrate. The petitioners face allegations under Section 379 I.P.C. They were granted bail subject to conditions. Inter alia, it was directed that the petitioners must deposit an amount of Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and their sureties must deposit their title deeds.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this onerous conditions make it impossible for the petitioners to claim bail and release from custody. It is submitted that the conditions imposed are harsh and the petitioners are not capable of complying with the same. If the conditions are not modified, the petitioners will have to languish in prison until the case against them is finally disposed of, laments the counsel.

3. Notice was given. The learned Prosecutor does not raise any objections. I am satisfied, in the facts and circumstances of this case that the prayer of the petitioners can be accepted. Crl.M.C.No. 2806 of 2007 2

4. This Crl.M.C. is allowed. The condition that the petitioners must deposit an amount of Rs.10,000/- each as cash security is hereby deleted. The condition that the sureties must deposit their title deeds is not set aside, but it is observed that if the sureties have valid reasons for not producing the title deeds, the learned Magistrate shall consider such reasons to be urged by them in the affidavit to be filed by them and take appropriate decision in the matter.

5. Hand over the order. (R. BASANT) Judge tm


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.