Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SEENA LATHEEF @ SUMAYYA LATHEEF versus KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SEENA LATHEEF @ SUMAYYA LATHEEF v. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD - WP(C) No. 26798 of 2007(M) [2007] RD-KL 16953 (7 September 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 26798 of 2007(M)

1. SEENA LATHEEF @ SUMAYYA LATHEEF,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
... Respondent

2. THE ESTATE OFFICER(DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER

3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

For Petitioner :SRI.SIVAN MADATHIL

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

Dated :07/09/2007

O R D E R

ANTONY DOMINIC,J


================
W.P.(C).No.26798 of 2007
===========================

Dated this the 7th day of September, 2007



JUDGMENT

Ext.P5 is an order passed by the Estate Officer under the Kerala Public Building(Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act 1968. Aggrieved by the said order, invoking the Appellate power of the 4th respondent under Section 10 of the said Act, petitioner has filed Ext.P6 appeal. Along with Ext.P6 appeal, petitioner has also sought stay of implementation of Ext.P5 order of the Estate Officer. It is submitted that during the pendency of the appeal and stay petition, petitioner is sought to be evicted from the premises.

2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 3 also and taking into account the pendency of the statutory appeal and the stay petition before the 4th respondent, I dispose of the writ petition directing the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on the stay petition filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. W.P.(C).No.26798 of 2007 2 Before orders are passed as above, petitioner shall be given an opportunity of hearing in the matter. Until orders are passed as above, further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P5 shall be kept in abeyance.

ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE

dvs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.