Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KAMALA, AGED 37 YEARS versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


KAMALA, AGED 37 YEARS v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 5482 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 17127 (11 September 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5482 of 2007()

1. KAMALA, AGED 37 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :11/09/2007

O R D E R

R. BASANT, J.

B.A. No. 5482 OF 2007

Dated this the 11th day of September, 2007

ORDER

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner - a woman, faces allegations under the Kerala Abkari Act. She was allegedly found to be in possession of 40 x 180 ml. of Indian Made Foreign Liquor which can lawfully be sold only in Karnataka. The detection was on 2/8/07. The seizure was effected; but the petitioner could not be arrested as the detecting Excise party did not consist of any woman official. The petitioner apprehends arrest at any moment.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is absolutely innocent. It is prayed that directions under Sec.438 of the Cr.P.C. may be issued in favour of the petitioner.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the application. There are no circumstances justifying the invocation of the B.A. No. 5482 OF 2007 -: 2 :- discretion under Sec.438 of the Cr.P.C. This is a fit case where the petitioner must appear before the Investigating Officer or the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction and then seek regular bail in the ordinary course, submits the learned Public Prosecutor. I find merit in the opposition by the learned Public Prosecutor. I am satisfied that there are no features in this case which would justify the invocation of the extraordinary equitable discretion under Sec.438 of the Cr.P.C. I agree with the learned Public Prosecutor that this is a fit case where the petitioner must appear before the Investigating Officer or the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction and then seek regular bail in the ordinary course.

4. In the result, this bail application is dismissed; but with the observation that if the petitioner surrenders before the Investigating Officer or the learned Magistrate and seeks bail, after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits and expeditiously. Sd/- Nan/

(R. BASANT, JUDGE)

//true copy// P.S. to Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.