Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJESH I.V., H/O. K.RAMA BALA versus S.H.O. NELESHWAR POLICE STATION

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


RAJESH I.V., H/O. K.RAMA BALA v. S.H.O. NELESHWAR POLICE STATION - Crl MC No. 4007 of 2006(R) [2007] RD-KL 1728 (22 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 4007 of 2006(R)

1. RAJESH I.V., H/O. K.RAMA BALA,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. S.H.O. NELESHWAR POLICE STATION,
... Respondent

2. K.P.ASHRAF, S/O. ABDULLA,

For Petitioner :SRI.M.SANTHOSHKUMAR

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :22/01/2007

O R D E R

R. BASANT, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Crl.M.C.No. 4007 of 2006
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner has come to this Court with a prayer that the F.I.R. registered against him under Section 420 I.P.C. may be quashed. Continuance of the investigation in this case works out unnecessary prejudice and hardship to the petitioner. The interests of justice demand that the proceedings must be quashed. There was essentially a civil dispute between the defacto complainant/2nd respondent and the petitioner herein. The complaint was filed alleging offence under Section 420 I.P.C. Investigation is in progress. In the mean time, the parties have settled their disputes. The 2nd respondent, who has entered appearance, confirms that the matter has been settled between the parties. A joint application by the petitioner and the 2nd respondent duly counter signed by their counsel is also filed.

2. Notice is given to the learned Prosecutor and the Prosecutor submits that the State has no objection in the relief being granted to the petitioner. As the investigation is not complete and the Crl.M.C.No. 4007 of 2006 2 charge sheet has not been filed, the parties are not able to seek permission of the Court to compound the offence under Section 320(2) Cr.P.C.

3. Having considered all the relevant inputs, I am satisfied that this is a fit case where powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be invoked as requested by all concerned and the investigation in the crime can be quashed.

4. This Crl.M.C. is hence allowed. Crime No.250 of 2006 of Nileswer Police Station under Section 420 I.P.C. is hereby quashed. (R. BASANT) Judge tm


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.