Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RATHEESH,VATTAVILA PUTHENVEEDU versus THE S.I. OF POLICE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


RATHEESH,VATTAVILA PUTHENVEEDU v. THE S.I. OF POLICE - Bail Appl No. 5575 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 17412 (17 September 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5575 of 2007()

1. RATHEESH,VATTAVILA PUTHENVEEDU,
... Petitioner

2. BINUKUMAR,LAKSHMI BHAVAN,

Vs

1. THE S.I. OF POLICE,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.SASTHAMANGALAM S. AJITHKUMAR

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :17/09/2007

O R D E R

R. BASANT, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
B.A.No. 5575 of 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 17th day of September, 2007

O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioners are accused 1 and 2. They along with the co-accused i.e. A3, face allegations, inter alia, under Sections 452 and 354 I.P.C. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are absolutely innocent. They may be granted anticipatory bail, it is prayed.

2. The learned Prosecutor opposes the application. There are only three accused persons. The third accused has already been arrested. Investigation is complete. Final report has already been filed. The police do not want to arrest the petitioners. It is for the petitioners to surrender before the learned Magistrate and seek regular bail in the ordinary course. There are no circumstances justifying or warranting the invocation of the extra ordinary equitable discretion under Section 438 Cr.P.C., submits the learned Prosecutor.

4. Having considered all the relevant inputs, I am satisfied that there are no features in this case which can justify or warrant the B.A.No. 5575 of 2007 2 invocation of the extra ordinary equitable discretion under Section 438 Cr.P.C. This I am satisfied is a fit case where the petitioners must resort to the ordinary and normal procedure of appearing before the the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction and then seek regular bail in the ordinary course.

5. This application is accordingly dismissed. Needless to say, if the petitioners appear before the Investigating Officer or the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction and apply for bail after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass orders on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself. (R. BASANT) Judge tm


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.