Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SANTHOSH.K., MIG ,43 versus J.P.TRADS AND AGENCIES

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SANTHOSH.K., MIG ,43 v. J.P.TRADS AND AGENCIES - Crl MC No. 2916 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 17477 (18 September 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 2916 of 2007()

1. SANTHOSH.K., MIG ,43,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. J.P.TRADS AND AGENCIES,
... Respondent

2. STATE REPRESENTED BY S.I,OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.C.D.JOHNY

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :18/09/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J.

Crl.M.C.No.2916 of 2007

Dated this the 18th day of September 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner faces indictment in a prosecution for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Cognizance was taken as early as in 2002. The petitioner had not appeared before the learned Magistrate. Consequently, from 10/2/2004, a non-bailable warrant issued by the learned Magistrate is chasing the petitioner. According to the petitioner, he is absolutely innocent. His absence earlier was not wilful or deliberate. The petitioner is willing to surrender before the learned Magistrate and seek regular bail. But he apprehends that his application for bail may not be considered by the learned Magistrate on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. He, therefore, prays that directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. may be issued to the learned Magistrate to release the petitioner on bail when he appears and applies for bail.

2. It is for the petitioner to appear before the learned Magistrate and explain to the learned Magistrate, the Crl.M.C.No.2916/07 2 circumstances under which he could not earlier appear before the learned Magistrate. I find absolutely no reason to assume that the learned Magistrate would not consider the application for bail to be filed by the petitioner on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. Every court must do the same. No special or specific directions appear to be necessary. Sufficient general directions have been issued in Alice George vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police [2003(1)KLT 339].

3. In the result, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is dismissed but with the specific observation that if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Magistrate and applies for bail, after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge Crl.M.C.No.2916/07 3 Crl.M.C.No.2916/07 4

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.