Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

P.AUSTIN, S/O. PALOO, AGED 56 YEARS versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


P.AUSTIN, S/O. PALOO, AGED 56 YEARS v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS - WP(C) No. 23203 of 2007(K) [2007] RD-KL 17540 (19 September 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 23203 of 2007(K)

1. P.AUSTIN, S/O. PALOO, AGED 56 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS
... Respondent

2. CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPUAM,

3. VAMADEVAN, S/O. KUNJACHAN,

For Petitioner :SRI.V.SURESH

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

Dated :19/09/2007

O R D E R

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.

.......................................................... W.P.(C)No.23203 OF 2007 ...........................................................

DATED THIS THE 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2007



J U D G M E N T

I find merit in the submission of Mr.N.Nandakumara Menon, Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent-Corporation that since regular civil court is already in seisin of the matter at the instance of the 3rd respondent, the Corporation may not be able to pass effective orders on Ext.P1 and Ext.P1(a) even if they are considered. However, since the request of counsel for the petitioner is only to direct the Corporation to consider Exts.P1 and P1(a), I dispose of the Writ Petition, without going into the merits of the grounds, issuing the following directions:- The 2nd respondent-Corporation will take up Exts.P1 and P1(a), issue notice to the 3rd respondent and the petitioner, hear both of them and take a correct and just decision on Exts.P1 and P1(a), on the basis of the submissions which may be addressed by the petitioner and the 3rd respondent during hearing. Decision as directed above shall be taken by the Corporation at their earliest.

(PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE)

tgl WP(C)N0. WP(C)N0.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.