Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

K.VISWESH, AGED 15, (MINOR) versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


K.VISWESH, AGED 15, (MINOR) v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - WA No. 89 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 1800 (23 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA No. 89 of 2007()

1. K.VISWESH, AGED 15, (MINOR),
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,

3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,

4. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER,

5. ASSISTANT EDUCATION OFFICER/

6. GENERAL CONVENOR,

For Petitioner :SRI.MATHEW PAUL

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.V.K.BALI The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.RAMACHANDRAN

Dated :23/01/2007

O R D E R

V.K.Bali,C.J. & M.Ramachandran,J.

W.A.No.89 of 2007

Dated, this the 23rd day of January, 2007



JUDGMENT

V.K.Bali,C.J. (Oral) The challenge in the present Writ Appeal is to the order dated 10th January, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge recorded in W.P.(C).No.1069 of 2007. The appellant, who is the petitioner in the original lis, was a participant in the Kozhikode Revenue District School Kalolsavam 2006-07 in 'English Essay Writing Competition'. It is his case that he was only awarded 'C' Grade. Challenging the award of 'C' Grade, petitioner filed appeal before the appellate authority, the Deputy Director of Education, Kozhikode, the 3rd respondent, which was dismissed. Aggrieved, thus, he filed the writ, which has been dismissed.

2. The only point raised in support of the petition before the learned Single Judge so also before us is that the time for writing essay competition was too short. On the aforesaid W.A.No.89 of 2007 - 2 - contention, the learned Single Judge recorded the following order:-

"Ground raised by petitioner is that time for writing essay competition is inadequate. I feel it is not tenable because other competitors were given the same time. Mark difference between petitioner and first prize winner is 109. In the circumstances, writ petition is devoid of merit and it is dismissed". We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the order passed by the learned Single Judge. There is no merit in this appeal, which we hereby dismiss. V.K.Bali Chief Justice M.Ramachandran vku/- Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.