Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MANESH, AGED 29 YEARS versus S.I. OF POLICE, ARANMULA POLICE STATION

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


MANESH, AGED 29 YEARS v. S.I. OF POLICE, ARANMULA POLICE STATION - Bail Appl No. 7614 of 2006 [2007] RD-KL 186 (3 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 7614 of 2006()

1. MANESH, AGED 29 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. S.I. OF POLICE, ARANMULA POLICE STATION.
... Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

For Petitioner :SRI.V.SETHUNATH

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :03/01/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

B.A.NO.7761 OF 2006 Dt. JANUARY 3, 2007

ORDER

Petitioner who is the accused in Crime No.533/2006 of Aranmula Police Station for offences punishable under secs.51, 63, 52(A) and 68(A) of the Copy Right Act, 1957 and sec.292 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application submitting inter alia that this is an offence which is eating into the economy of the nation and cine producers are vitally affected by such piracy committed rampantly and with impunity and that film industry itself is at the verge of collapse on account of such copy right violations.

3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioner on bail for a period of one month in the event of his arrest in connection with the above case on each of them executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like B.A.7614/2006 Page numbers amount to the satisfaction of the said officer and subject to the following conditions:-

1. Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

2. Petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

3. Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

4. Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

5. Petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above.

(V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

mt/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.