Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BABU K.A., S/O. K.T.AUGUSTHY versus THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BABU K.A., S/O. K.T.AUGUSTHY v. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER - WP(C) No. 3266 of 2007(L) [2007] RD-KL 2169 (31 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 3266 of 2007(L)

1. BABU K.A., S/O. K.T.AUGUSTHY,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER,
... Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT,

For Petitioner :SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.K.DENESAN

Dated :31/01/2007

O R D E R

K.K.DENESAN, J.

WP(C)No. 3266 OF 2007

Dated this the 31st January, 2007.



JUDGMENT

Heard both sides.

2. The petitioner who is working as Scavenger in the Medical College Hospital, Kottayam since 2002, apprehends that he will not be considered for selection to regular vacancies in the same post for the reason that he is now working in the establishment on daily wages. The stand taken by the respondents in a similar writ petition was that appointments can be made only from the list of candidates forwarded by the Employment Exchange and since the petitioner is already employed, his name cannot be included in the list to be furnished by the Employment Exchange. After considering the above contention also,

this Court in the judgment dated 20.11.2003 in W.PC)No:

35446/2003(Ext.P4), directed that as and when the respondents consider steps for the regular selection of part-time workers as Scavenging Workers, the petitioners therein, who had registered their names in the Employment Exchange, will also be entitled to participate in the selection.

3. The petitioner is similarly situated like the petitioners in Ext.P4. It is submitted that they had WPC 3266/2007 2 registered their names in the Employment Exchange. If that is so, the petitioner also will be entitled to the benefit granted to the petitioners in Ext.P4 judgment. It is hereby ordered that the petitioner shall be permitted to participate along with other candidates sponsored by the Employment Exchange provided he has got registration through Employment Exchange.

4. The petitioner has got a case that he is a person with disability and is entitled to be considered against 3% quota reserved for such categories of candidates. It is not understood whether the respondent has earmarked vacancies for such categories.

5. Reserving the right of the petitioner to claim appointment against the quota reserved for persons with disability and directing the respondents to consider him for the post of Part time employee along with other candidates who are sponsored by the Employment Exchange this writ petition is disposed of. K.K.DENESAN Judge jj/jan


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.