Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

C.B.THILAKAN, SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT versus THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


C.B.THILAKAN, SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT v. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD - WP(C) No. 3195 of 2007(E) [2007] RD-KL 2176 (31 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 3195 of 2007(E)

1. C.B.THILAKAN, SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
... Respondent

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM), K.S.E.B.,

3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

For Petitioner :SRI.S.EASWARAN

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.K.DENESAN

Dated :31/01/2007

O R D E R

K.K. DENESAN, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 3195 OF 2007 E = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Dated this the 31st January, 2007



J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has retired from service. D.C.R.G. as determined by the respondent-Board has been paid to him pursuant to directions issued by this Court in Ext. P2 judgment. Thereafter, Ext. P5 notice has been issued by the 3rd respondent directing the petitioner to remit the amount of liability fixed by the Board within 7 days. He is informed that if the amount is not remitted appropriate action to deduct the said amount will be taken. The petitioner submits that Ext. P5 notice is not in conformity with the findings made by this Court in the judgment or the freedom given to the respondents.

2. In my view, it will be too early for this Court to consider the merits of the contentions of the petitioner since what is challenged is only a notice issued by the 3rd respondent. The petitioner, if so advised, can send a reply to Ext. P5 taking up the contentions available to him. If final decision is taken to the prejudice of the petitioner, at that stage WPC No. 3195/2007 -2- only he need invoke the jurisdiction of this Court. Therefore, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file reply to Ext. P5, this writ petition is disposed of. K.K. DENESAN

JUDGE

jan/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.