Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

AIR LINK INDIA LTD., 7 KYD STREET versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


AIR LINK INDIA LTD., 7 KYD STREET v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Crl MC No. 509 of 2006 [2007] RD-KL 224 (4 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 509 of 2006()

1. AIR LINK INDIA LTD., 7 KYD STREET,
... Petitioner

2. VINOD NAIR, DEPUTY REGIONAL MANAGER

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

2. MR. JAMES FERNANDEZ, T.C.34/824,

3. MR. SURESH KUMAR, RESIDING AT

For Petitioner :SRI.SUNIL JACOB JOSE

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :04/01/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

Crl.M.C.No.509 of 2006

Dated this the 4th day of January 2007

O R D E R

The petitioners are accused 1 and 2 in a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The first accused is a company and the second accused, its Deputy Regional Manager, is the person who has allegedly signed in the cheque on behalf of the first accused. Cognizance has been taken by the learned Magistrate against the petitioners herein as also the third accused, the Manager of the Thiruvananthapuram unit of the first accused company.

2. The petitioners have come to this court with a prayer that the proceedings against them may be quashed invoking the powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

3. What is the reason? The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that blank signed cheques were misutilised by the third accused and were handed over to different persons including the complainant. In these circumstances, petitioners 1 and 2 cannot be saddled with any liability on those cheques. Crl.M.C.No.509/06 2

4. This essentially is a contention which the petitioners will have to raise before the learned Magistrate in the course of the trial. At the stage of Section 482 Cr.P.C invoking the inherent jurisdiction, such disputed questions of fact cannot obviously be resolved. The petitioners will, of course, be entitled to contend that the blank signed cheques in the account, for which the first accused is the drawer/account holder and the second accused is the signatory, have been misutilised by the third respondent. The learned Magistrate will certainly have to consider such contention on merits.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners have now come to realise that the cheque in question is not signed by the second accused also. That again is a contention which the petitioners have the liberty to raise before the learned Magistrate at the appropriate stage. On the basis of that contention, proceedings cannot obviously be quashed.

6. In the result, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is dismissed with the above observation.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr Crl.M.C.No.509/06 3 Crl.M.C.No.509/06 4

R.BASANT, J

C.R.R.P.No.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF JULY 2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.