Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHIBUKUMAR, AGED 30 YEARS versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SHIBUKUMAR, AGED 30 YEARS v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 632 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 2289 (31 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 632 of 2007()

1. SHIBUKUMAR, AGED 30 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :31/01/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 632 of 2007

DATED: 31st January, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner who is the 4th accused Crime No. 20/00 of Vihinjam Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 283 read with Sec. 149 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail.

2. Consequent on the non-appearance of the petitioner in C.C. 366/00 before the Judl. First Class Magistrate Court-II, Neyyattinkara, the case against the petitioner was split up and re- filed as C.C. 850 of 2006. Admittedly, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Such being the position, I am not inclined to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction by granting anticipatory bail. It is for the petitioner to seek regular bail after surrendering before the concerned Magistrate's Court. Petitioner has a contention that co-accused in the case have been acquitted after trial. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate within two weeks from today and files an application for regular bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of (despite the non-bailable warrant of arrest pending against the petitioner) Bail A.No.632/07 -:2:- preferably on the same day on which it is filed after considering the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non- appearance and also after considering the contention of the petitioner that the co-accused in the case have been acquitted after trial. With the above observation this application is dismissed. Sd/- V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE.

ani


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.