Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

A.CHANDRAN, S/O.APPU versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


A.CHANDRAN, S/O.APPU v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 267 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 2334 (1 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 267 of 2007()

1. A.CHANDRAN, S/O.APPU,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.M.SREEKUMAR

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :01/02/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

```````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No. 267 OF 2007 ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Dated this the 1st day of February, 2007

O R D E R

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner, who is the first accused in Crime No.298/2006 of Aryancode Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 324, 325, 323 and 308 read with section 34 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail. The occurrence took place on 5.12.2006 at 8.30 p.m. during which the de facto complainant is alleged to have been attacked by the petitioner using a sword.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application submitting, inter alia, that apart from the fact that this is the second application for anticipatory bail, the petitioner is an accused in crime No.99/2004 of Thambanoor Police Station for an offence punishable under section 401 IPC, crime No.519/06 of Chathannoor Police Station for an offence punishable under section 48(c) of the Kerala Police Act and crime No.420/06 of Kuzhithura Police Station for an offence punishable under section 379 IPC.

3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the BA.267/07 2 petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate concerned and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same date on which it is filed. With the above observation, this application is disposed of.

(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

aks


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.